Griffin Takes Powerful New Approach to 9/11 Truth
Review of David Ray Griffin's latest book

by Tod Fletcher

Global Research, March 15, 2008

9/11 CONTRADICTIONS by David Ray Griffin is the fifth of his books to
examine the official account of the events of September 11, 2001.
This brilliant and highly readable book takes a new yet simple
approach to the truth about 9/11. It focuses entirely on
contradictory statements made by members of the Bush administration,
government departments and agencies, and official bodies such as the
9/11 Commission. All the statements that Griffin examines are
official claims in direct conflict with other official claims. How
could this be? Why would the government keep changing "the official
story"? The public, of course, is expected to take all the statements
as incontrovertibly true, yet they directly conflict with one another.

And why, if the government pronouncements are contradictory, haven't
members of Congress and the mainstream media launched investigations
to determine which are true and which are false, and to ask why are
obvious falsehoods about the events of 9/11 being promulgated by the
government? I say "obvious falsehoods" because, as Griffin explains
in the Preface, "If [Transportation Secretary Norman] Mineta said
"P," that is a fact. If the 9/11 Commission said "not P," that is a
fact. And it is a fact that "P" and "not P" cannot both be true" (p.
viii). The subtitle, "An Open Letter to Congress and the Press,"
indicates Griffin's hope that the juxtaposition of the contradictory
claims the book provides will stimulate such investigations. But the
book is really intended for the public at large, and its clear focus
makes it the easiest to read of all Griffin's books on 9/11. Because
of its relative simplicity it is a perfect introduction to the subject.

Drawing on government publications, media reports, testimony from the
9/11 Commission hearings, oral histories from the Fire Department of
New York, and other official sources, Griffin documents masterfully
25 of the most serious contradictions, divided into five parts:

"Part I. Questions about Bush Administration and Pentagon Leaders,"
reveals the contradictory claims about the activities of George Bush,
Dick Cheney, Richard Myers, Donald Rumsfeld and Ted Olson. In this
part Griffin shows that Bush's long stay at the Florida school was
initially confirmed and later denied by the White House, that various
government spokespersons and the 9/11 Commission could not agree on
where Cheney, Myers and Rumsfeld were at key times that morning, and
that DOJ Solicitor General Ted Olson's claims to have received phone
calls from his wife on Flight 77 were directly contradicted by the
DOJ's FBI.

"Part II. Questions about the US Military," explores the many
contradictions within government claims about when the military was
alerted to the emergencies on the flights, whether the military could
have shot down Flight 93, and whether it had envisioned 9/11-type
attacks prior to that day.

"Part III. Questions about Osama bin Laden & the Hijackers," examines
the contradictions in official claims about the religious devotion of
the alleged hijackers, where the luggage with the Arabic-language
flight manuals, attributed to Mohamed Atta, was found, whether cell
phone calls from the flights provided evidence of hijackers, and the
existence of hard evidence for Osama bin Laden's responsibility.

"Part IV. Questions about the Pentagon," spotlights contradictions in
the official account of Hani Hanjour's flying skills, what caused the
large hole in the interior C Ring wall of the building, and whether a
sophisticated US military reconnaissance plane was overhead during
the attack.

"Part V. Questions about the World Trade Center," exposes the
contradictions in Rudy Giuliani's account of his foreknowledge of the
catastrophic collapse of the Twin Towers, in the official claims
about explosions in the towers and WTC 7 before they disintegrated,
and in official statements concerning the presence of molten steel in
the subbasements after the buildings came down.

When examined under Griffin's microscope, it becomes clear that the
"official story" has kept changing over time, just like the stories
criminals tell as they are interrogated. As holes in the government's
explanations of the incomprehensible events opened up under
questioning, to some degree from the press but primarily from the
9/11 truth movement, they were plugged by new claims. And virtually
all of the new claims have been accepted by the press and Congress
without asking how they could be true in light of the earlier,
contradictory claims. You don't need to be a conspiracy theorist to
see that when the story keeps changing, doubt is cast on all of its
versions. Any police investigator knows this, as should investigative
journalists and elected representatives.

Of course, if Congress and the press won't do their jobs, it's up to
the rest of us. With this authoritative dissection of the conflicting
statements of the principal suspects, Griffin has done much of the
pre-trial legwork already. The American public should not allow his
selfless devotion to truth and justice to be squandered by inaction.
This may be one of those things that representatives just cannot do
for us.

Link to Amazon: